Some corrections that may
significantly improve the
already very famous TS-940S
receiving performance
Dedicated to the Detail Lists
Are you a TS-940S Rx lover? You
should know that it can be even
better if you do some
corrections. Two errors that I
found, both also showed in the
Service Manual, Revised Edition.

See the FETs Q10 (RF Preamp
Preamp 2SK125, N-FET, 25V, 0.1A,
0.3W) and
Q4 Q5 (2nd balanced mixer, also
2SK125).
The picture above was scanned
from the TS-940S Service Manual,
Revised Edition.
In these pictures the FETs are
in the wrong position.
I can assume that thousands of
other TS-940S are also waiting
to be corrected and perform Rx
even better (mistakes "hidden"
for almost 20 years!)
Check yourself with instruments,
it can be probably more than 10
dB of gain and a better AGC
performance.

See the Level Diagram in the
Service Manual. With the FETs on
the right position,
we would have 12.5 dB (17 - 4.5)
gain in the RF Preamp,
and 17 dB (44 - 27) in the 2nd
balanced mixer at the indicated
points in the picture above.
It would be interesting to
measure these gains before the
correction.
With this measurement we would
have an idea about the
sensitivity losses due to the
two errors.
I laught a lot when I confirmed
both errors! Almost two decades
waiting to be corrected!
As I never heard about this
problem, I decided to reveal it
to the whole world.
My radio was working apparently
well. This is the 1st TS-940S
that I could observe and analyze
in detail its circuits. First I
found the RF Preamp FET in a odd
position, but only few days
after I could focus and see that
the cascode circuit was correct
in the schematic diagram and
wrong in the PC board. It was
also wrong in the PC board view
pictures in the Service Manual.
I also noticed that a FET was
hotter than the other. It was as
simple as disordered and turn
the FET 180° and resolder it all
over again.
Some FETs can be used either way
around without any noticeable
change in behaviour. However,
most FETs are built with a
channel wider at one end that
the other. So, although you can
use a FET with the drain and
source leads swapped around,
most of them don't work very
well if you try it. Therefore
try to correct your TS-940S. Who
knows that the 2SK125 can be
swapped?

This picture shows the FET
in the correct position.
The RF gain increased and the
noise decreased. Very fine! But,
in the middle of the night,
excited with this amazing
discovery, I kept on thinking if
this error was the only one.
I got back to the Service
Manual, and following the
circuit diagram, checking the PC
boards, I found a second
mistake: in the 2nd balanced
mixer, in the IF unit, another
inverted FET (Q4), harming the
mixing/conversion, the gain, and
the AGC performance.

This picture shows the FET
in the correct position.
By eliminating these "losses",
my famous TS-940S "won" 10 dB
more! Because of that, I had to
made S-Meter adjustments.
I suggest you to revise the
famous TS-940S receiving
performance to be even better,
of course!
Our next step will be identify
different N-FET for replacement.
The 2SK125 is discontinued since
1996. Probably by using modern
FETs, the receiving performance
will increase. Who knows?
I recommend voltage measurements
before and after the correction.
The modifications were verified
and tested by myself, so if you
try this mod on your own
equipment, it's on your own
risk.
Have fun, revise your TS-940S!
Smile!
Nelson Ricardo - PY1NR
Do not hesitated to contact us
if you have questions
This
article can also be found at
http://www.guisard.com/Index_Choose_Language.htm. |